Is this clinical consulting?

No. This practice does not advise on medicine, diagnosis, treatment protocols, licensure standards, or clinical practice. The work is organizational: process, staffing, communication, capacity, and access.

Do you need access to participant records?

No. The review uses process documents, de-identified operational data you already keep, and staff interviews. Nothing requires access to individual records.

How is this different from an organizational assessment?

An organizational assessment looks across the whole institution. This is focused on the path people take into and through your programs, and the operating decisions behind it.

Will this end in recommendations we cannot afford?

The action set is split deliberately: what can change with current staff and process, and what would require new investment or a board decision.

Service

Participant Experience & Access

Programs people can find, reach, and stay with — reviewed as one organizational system.

Back to the 360 service map View investment guidance

Who this helps

Leaders responsible for a consequential organizational decision.

Human-service agencies with multiple programs and a shared intake function
Community health, behavioral health, and family-service organizations
Housing, aging-services, food-security, and disability-service providers
Organizations whose growth has outrun their front-line capacity

What we will accomplish

A non-clinical review of how people actually reach and move through your programs — inquiry, intake, referral, waitlist, follow-through, and departure — and the staffing, hours, communication, and operating decisions that shape that experience.

A clear picture of where people fall out between first contact and first service
Intake and referral pathways that are quicker to complete and easier to explain
Access barriers named specifically — hours, language, transportation, documentation, cost, digital
Program capacity and waitlist practices that reflect actual staffing
Communication that participants and referral partners can follow
Priorities separated into what can change now and what requires investment

A wheelchair user and family approaching an accessible community-service entrance.

How we work

Understand. Reveal. Choose. Build. Learn.

The same plain, five-stage method guides every service. The depth of evidence and participation is sized to your assignment.

01
Understand
Gather the evidence and perspectives needed to see the situation accurately.
02
Reveal
Make strengths, constraints, differing perspectives, and underlying causes clear.
03
Choose
Frame the real options, tradeoffs, priorities, and decisions.
04
Build
Create the substantial working document or roadmap, with responsibilities, resources, measures, and first actions.
05
Learn
Review implementation, test assumptions, and adjust while staying grounded in the mission.

Depending on your priorities, your engagement may include

The written proposal specifies the exact deliverables, timing, participation, and fixed fee for your assignment.

Participant journey review: inquiry, intake, eligibility, first service, follow-through, exit
Access barrier assessment across hours, location, language, documentation, cost, and digital channels
Intake and referral process mapping, with handoff points and response-time expectations
Waitlist and capacity review against current staffing and program design
Participant- and partner-facing communication review
Staffing and workflow recommendations for front-line and intake roles
Prioritized action set: immediate process changes, and changes that require funding or board decisions

One focused assignment example

A focused assignment might map one intake or referral pathway, identify access barriers, and define practical process improvements.

Timing and your participation

Scope depends on programs, sites, participant and partner listening, and the number of access pathways reviewed.

Participation is agreed at the outset. It may include the executive director, board chair, senior staff, trustees, and selected stakeholders whose perspective can materially improve the work.

Organizations often reach out when

Inquiries do not convert into enrolled participants and no one is sure where they stop
Waitlists keep growing while some program slots go unused
Referral partners say the process is hard to navigate
Program growth has outpaced intake, scheduling, and front-line staffing
A funder or accreditation review has raised access or equity questions

Investment and payment

Beginning at $12,500

Focused Consulting Engagement

Every service can begin as a Focused Consulting Engagement at $12,500, with a defined assignment, deliverables, timing, and fixed fee established in the written proposal. Broader work may be structured as an Organizational Strength Review or Integrated Strategic Direction when the need spans multiple areas.

Every assignment considers connections across the whole organization. Detailed work stays focused on the areas agreed in scope. Range drivers include interviews, board participation, sites, and specialist responsibilities. Travel or specialist expenses are included only when agreed in the proposal.

For larger engagements, the standard schedule is 40% on booking, 30% after the evidence and listening stage, and 30% on delivery. The final schedule is stated in the written proposal.

Major fixed-fee engagements include eight hours of implementation counsel during the 90 days following delivery.

Questions

Before you decide

IN SIGHT · A free weekly email

Free practical ideas on leadership, strategy, and strengthening mission-driven organizations.

Start a conversation

Bring the decision in front of you.

A complimentary 30-minute conversation helps establish the situation, fit, and a sensible next step. Detailed analysis and written recommendations begin with a paid engagement. Every engagement is principal-led; appropriate collaborators are added when the scope calls for specialist expertise.

Schedule a 30-Minute Conversation

Back to the 360 service map